codegeex4-all-9b-GGUF

我要开发同款
匿名用户2024年07月31日
19阅读
开发技术pytorch
所属分类ai、thudm、codegeex、glm
开源地址https://modelscope.cn/models/LLM-Research/codegeex4-all-9b-GGUF
授权协议other

作品详情

Llamacpp imatrix Quantizations of codegeex4-all-9b

Using llama.cpp release b3333 for quantization.

Original model: https://huggingface.co/THUDM/codegeex4-all-9b

All quants made using imatrix option with dataset from here

Prompt format

[gMASK] <sop> <|system|>
{system_prompt} <|user|>
{prompt} <|assistant|>

Download a file (not the whole branch) from below:

Filename Quant type File Size Description
codegeex4-all-9b-Q8_0.gguf Q8_0 9.99GB Extremely high quality, generally unneeded but max available quant.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q6KL.gguf Q6KL 8.56GB Uses Q8_0 for embed and output weights. Very high quality, near perfect, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q6_K.gguf Q6_K 8.26GB Very high quality, near perfect, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q5KL.gguf Q5KL 7.52GB Uses Q8_0 for embed and output weights. High quality, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q5KM.gguf Q5KM 7.14GB High quality, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q5KS.gguf Q5KS 6.69GB High quality, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q4KL.gguf Q4KL 6.71GB Uses Q8_0 for embed and output weights. Good quality, uses about 4.83 bits per weight, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q4KM.gguf Q4KM 6.25GB Good quality, uses about 4.83 bits per weight, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q4KS.gguf Q4KS 5.75GB Slightly lower quality with more space savings, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-IQ4_XS.gguf IQ4_XS 5.25GB Decent quality, smaller than Q4KS with similar performance, recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q3KXL.gguf Q3KXL 5.82GB Uses Q8_0 for embed and output weights. Lower quality but usable, good for low RAM availability.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q3KL.gguf Q3KL 5.28GB Lower quality but usable, good for low RAM availability.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q3KM.gguf Q3KM 5.06GB Even lower quality.
codegeex4-all-9b-IQ3_M.gguf IQ3_M 4.81GB Medium-low quality, new method with decent performance comparable to Q3KM.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q3KS.gguf Q3KS 4.58GB Low quality, not recommended.
codegeex4-all-9b-IQ3_XS.gguf IQ3_XS 4.42GB Lower quality, new method with decent performance, slightly better than Q3KS.
codegeex4-all-9b-IQ3_XXS.gguf IQ3_XXS 4.25GB Lower quality, new method with decent performance, comparable to Q3 quants.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q2KL.gguf Q2KL 4.59GB Uses Q8_0 for embed and output weights. Very low quality but surprisingly usable.
codegeex4-all-9b-Q2_K.gguf Q2_K 3.99GB Very low quality but surprisingly usable.
codegeex4-all-9b-IQ2_M.gguf IQ2_M 3.93GB Very low quality, uses SOTA techniques to also be surprisingly usable.
codegeex4-all-9b-IQ2_S.gguf IQ2_S 3.76GB Very low quality, uses SOTA techniques to be usable.
codegeex4-all-9b-IQ2_XS.gguf IQ2_XS 3.61GB Very low quality, uses SOTA techniques to be usable.

Credits

Thank you kalomaze and Dampf for assistance in creating the imatrix calibration dataset

Thank you ZeroWw for the inspiration to experiment with embed/output

Downloading using huggingface-cli

First, make sure you have hugginface-cli installed:

pip install -U "huggingface_hub[cli]"

Then, you can target the specific file you want:

huggingface-cli download bartowski/codegeex4-all-9b-GGUF --include "codegeex4-all-9b-Q4_K_M.gguf" --local-dir ./

If the model is bigger than 50GB, it will have been split into multiple files. In order to download them all to a local folder, run:

huggingface-cli download bartowski/codegeex4-all-9b-GGUF --include "codegeex4-all-9b-Q8_0.gguf/*" --local-dir codegeex4-all-9b-Q8_0

You can either specify a new local-dir (codegeex4-all-9b-Q8_0) or download them all in place (./)

Which file should I choose?

A great write up with charts showing various performances is provided by Artefact2 here

The first thing to figure out is how big a model you can run. To do this, you'll need to figure out how much RAM and/or VRAM you have.

If you want your model running as FAST as possible, you'll want to fit the whole thing on your GPU's VRAM. Aim for a quant with a file size 1-2GB smaller than your GPU's total VRAM.

If you want the absolute maximum quality, add both your system RAM and your GPU's VRAM together, then similarly grab a quant with a file size 1-2GB Smaller than that total.

Next, you'll need to decide if you want to use an 'I-quant' or a 'K-quant'.

If you don't want to think too much, grab one of the K-quants. These are in format 'QXKX', like Q5KM.

If you want to get more into the weeds, you can check out this extremely useful feature chart:

llama.cpp feature matrix

But basically, if you're aiming for below Q4, and you're running cuBLAS (Nvidia) or rocBLAS (AMD), you should look towards the I-quants. These are in format IQXX, like IQ3M. These are newer and offer better performance for their size.

These I-quants can also be used on CPU and Apple Metal, but will be slower than their K-quant equivalent, so speed vs performance is a tradeoff you'll have to decide.

The I-quants are not compatible with Vulcan, which is also AMD, so if you have an AMD card double check if you're using the rocBLAS build or the Vulcan build. At the time of writing this, LM Studio has a preview with ROCm support, and other inference engines have specific builds for ROCm.

Want to support my work? Visit my ko-fi page here: https://ko-fi.com/bartowski

声明:本文仅代表作者观点,不代表本站立场。如果侵犯到您的合法权益,请联系我们删除侵权资源!如果遇到资源链接失效,请您通过评论或工单的方式通知管理员。未经允许,不得转载,本站所有资源文章禁止商业使用运营!
下载安装【程序员客栈】APP
实时对接需求、及时收发消息、丰富的开放项目需求、随时随地查看项目状态

评论